Working with web.config include files in Sitecore 6
In my previous post about Working with multiple content databases; Lars Floe Nielsen made a comment about something I’ve been meaning to write about for a long time.
Configuration files. Such a pain, aren’t they?
Anyone who has ever stepped through 6 Sitecore upgrades and meticulously stepped through the web.config change instructions line by line will know what I mean. Would be so much easier to just replace your web.config with the one matching the latest Sitecore version you were upgrading to.
Or what about your environments? Dev environment, Staging environment, Live environment, Slave server environment? All with different configuration settings. This has already been blogged about, and I am not going to dig particularly deep into this topic in this post.
Starting from Sitecore 6 (actually, V5, but I’ve had a very hard time tracking more information down on it than can be found in Alexeys post on the matter), Sitecore actually introduced a really neat new functionality. It’s called “Web Config Patching”, but to be honest I don’t personally like the term “patching” being used in this context, even if this IS technically what the functionality does.
So far, I have not really been able to locate much in terms of official documentation on this subject (searching SDN directly provides very few clues), so most of my knowledge on it comes from personal experience, chatting with other Sitecore consultants/investigators, studying other configuration include files and spiced with generous dosages of Reflector.
In the “What’s new” released for Sitecore 6, the functionality gets the following mention:
“Previous versions of Sitecore CMS forced administrators to make direct changes to configuration settings in the web.config file manually. This led to challenges locating local configuration changes as opposed to modifications made by Sitecore when upgrading to a new version of Sitecore. Sitecore 6 offers a smart solution: web.config modifications can now be made in a separate XML file, stored under the /App_Config/Include folder, which Sitecore reads in at startup time after loading the web.config file. The folder contains several example files which illustrate how to use this feature. The Sitecore 6 configuration factory reads the include config files”
The information appears out of date however, and no such “example files” can be found in any version of Sitecore 6 I have had my hands on.
Anyway. On we go.
So how and where does it work?
To make good use of config includes, one must first understand how Sitecore implements it. And to get some idea of this, one must know a little bit about how a web.config file is organised.
If you open up a standard Sitecore web.config and look near the top, the first thing you will see will be looking something like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <configuration> <configSections> <section name="sitecore" type="Sitecore.Configuration.ConfigReader, Sitecore.Kernel" /> <section name="log4net" type="log4net.Config.Log4NetConfigurationSectionHandler, Sitecore.Logging" /> <sectionGroup name="system.web.extensions" type="System.Web.Configuration.SystemWebExtensionsSectionGroup, System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35"> <sectionGroup name="scripting" type="System.Web.Configuration.ScriptingSectionGroup, System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35"> <section name="scriptResourceHandler" type="System.Web.Configuration.ScriptingScriptResourceHandlerSection, System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" requirePermission="false" allowDefinition="MachineToApplication" /> <sectionGroup name="webServices" type="System.Web.Configuration.ScriptingWebServicesSectionGroup, System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35"> <section name="jsonSerialization" type="System.Web.Configuration.ScriptingJsonSerializationSection, System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" requirePermission="false" allowDefinition="Everywhere" /> <section name="profileService" type="System.Web.Configuration.ScriptingProfileServiceSection, System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" requirePermission="false" allowDefinition="MachineToApplication" /> <section name="authenticationService" type="System.Web.Configuration.ScriptingAuthenticationServiceSection, System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" requirePermission="false" allowDefinition="MachineToApplication" /> <section name="roleService" type="System.Web.Configuration.ScriptingRoleServiceSection, System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" requirePermission="false" allowDefinition="MachineToApplication" /> </sectionGroup> </sectionGroup> </sectionGroup> </configSections>
What is declared here, are the different Configuration Sections that ASP.NET can expect to find in the configuration file. Some of them are there to support ASP.NET, and some of them are put in there by Sitecore. You can learn more about the format of ASP.NET configuration files here.
Basically, what this then means is, that various “top level” configuration sections can be expected to appear in the web.config file we are looking at, and ASP.NET will (via the “type” attribute) know how to parse them. For normal every day use, most of us have probably been able to just use <appSettings> for whatever configuration we needed – but for configuring a complex application such as Sitecore, this just won’t be enough. Fortunately this is why ASP.NET allows us to create our own configuration sections with our own configuration handlers; and that is exactly what Sitecore has been doing for a very long time.
Now. Keeping in mind what I wrote above; Sitecore came up with a system that allows the include of configuration files. Tying that into what we just learned; to find and use this functionality we must then look in the config section that Sitecore provides. Not surprisingly, this section is called <sitecore> and this is where you configure the vast majority of what you need to do, to get your Sitecore installation up and running the way you want it.
Config Include only works in this configuration section
First thing to keep in mind, when using this technology.
This means it won’t work for <appSetting> configuration settings. Don’t worry about it – Sitecore has a perfectly good replacement for it; I’ll demonstrate in a bit.
How to set it up?
Here’s a bit of good news. There’s nothing really to set up. Sitecore comes with this functionality enabled out of the box, and all you need to do is to tap into it and use it.
If you open up Windows Explorer and navigate to /Website/App_Config/Include, you will (probably) find an empty folder. This is a directory that Sitecore is actively watching, for any additions or changes to it’s base web.config file. Remember I said how it was not fully correct to call this “config include”? This is because Sitecore actually offers more than just including more configuration files; it also allows you to edit existing configuration data defined in web.config. As long as it sits in the <sitecore> section :-)
As so often before when I am testing something; I create a new .ASPX file (with codebehinds) in the root of my website; I name it “TestInclude.aspx”, and I type the following code into the class Visual Studio generates for me:
public partial class TestInclude : System.Web.UI.Page { protected void Page_Load( object sender, EventArgs e ) { Response.Write( "The value of setting 'TestInclude' is: " + Sitecore.Configuration.Settings.GetSetting( "TestInclude", "Undefined" ) ); } }
At this point, the result I get when running the page is entirely as expected; “The value of setting 'TestInclude' is: Undefined”
Notice how the Sitecore API equivalent is much more elegant than the ASP.NET standard handling which would achieve the above in the <appSettings> section.
string val; if ( System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings[ "TestInclude" ] != null ) val = System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings[ "TestInclude" ]; else val = "Undefined";
But we’re not there yet. I then proceed to create a “New File” in the folder I mentioned above; /App_Config/Include and name it “TestInclude.config”
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/"> <sitecore> <settings> <setting name="TestInclude" value="This value comes from TestInclude.config"/> </settings> </sitecore> </configuration>
I run my .ASPX page again; and this time I get the result I was hoping for. “The value of setting 'TestInclude' is: This value comes from TestInclude.config”.
Great! :-) Things are working as expected. And I now have my own configuration files in a nice isolated area that can be easily packaged and deployed WITHOUT needing to worry (much) about the version of Sitecore that may be in place; and without needing to touch the original web.config in any way what so ever.
There’s another benefit; or at least in a majority of cases this is a benefit. Making modifications to your config include files take effect (almost) instantly and do not recycle your application pool.
Updating your config files will not force your website to reset
Another important fact to keep in mind. For better and (sometimes) for worse.
Notice how this is not limited to work with only <settings>. Anything in the Sitecore configuration structure can be added in your include file. If I wanted to add a new XSL helper, for instance, I would expand my file like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/"> <sitecore> <xslExtensions> <extension mode="on" type="CorePoint.XslHelpers.XslHelper, CorePoint.Library" namespace="http://www.corepoint-it.com/library/xslhelper" singleInstance="true" /> </xslExtensions> <settings> <setting name="TestInclude" value="This value comes from TestInclude.config"/> </settings> </sitecore> </configuration>
One last thing to mention about these include files before proceeding is; you can have as many of them as you like. They need to end in .config, but other than that there are no limitations. You can even create sub folders to your App_Config/Include directory and place your .config files there if you prefer; they too will be picked up by Sitecore’s configuration system.
More advanced work with your config include files
In the example I just went through, I adeptly (or maybe not…) skipped explaining part of the reason the config include file I created looks the way it does. What I did was to work with the include system in it’s simplest form. If you picture in your mind your original web.config file, and then merge my XML on top of it; you have a pretty good idea of what I have just done.
And this is fine; for settings. After all, a setting is a setting, and it matters not exactly WHERE in the configuration file the setting appears.
But what about the times when it does matter? Like for Sitecore pipelines for instance; I can assure you the order of which these pipelines executes is NOT irrelevant.
Positioning your configuration within the web.config is fortunately easily achieved. A few examples probably explain it better than I can type myself out of. So here goes.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/"> <sitecore> <pipelines> <httpRequestBegin> <!-- Insert own pipeline processor as the first element of the pipeline --> <processor patch:before="*[1]" type="CorePoint.Tracking.RequestTracker, CorePoint.Library" /> <!-- Insert own pipeline processor right after the Language Resolver --> <processor patch:after="*[@type='Sitecore.Pipelines.HttpRequest.LanguageResolver, Sitecore.Kernel']" type="CorePoint.Tracking.LanguageTracker, CorePoint.Library" /> </httpRequestBegin> </pipelines> <settings> <setting name="TestInclude" value="This value comes from TestInclude.config"/> </settings> </sitecore> </configuration>
As you can probably see, fairly advanced stuff can be done with configuration files. Most of this syntax and form I have exclusively from Reflector use, and I may not have it spot on correct. Finding official documentation on this topic has proven to be next to impossible. Except for lots of references on various comments around the web (recommended practise is to use config includes or “auto-includes” as they are also called) of course – but knowing HOW to use them is what this post is all about :-)
I would love to know how one can:
- Remove an existing configuration entirely
- Replace an existing functionality entirely
Both seem possible from digging around in Reflector – but given that this is actually a fairly involved process to test (at 2am in the morning), I chose to let the matter rest for this time. I will get back with an update if and when I learn more.
In summary
- Configuration include files is probably one of the features I personally like very much from an operational perspective in Sitecore 6
- The functionality is way under-documented; but hopefully now this post can help you get started
- So please; no more 3-page documents describing how to “merge” your configuration into web.config for <insert your module/functionality name here> :P
- You can modify config include files without resetting your website AppPool
- And lastly, it only works in the <sitecore> configuration section. Don’t attempt it for <system.web> or <system.webserver> for instance, it won’t work.
Labels: Configuration, Sitecore, Sitecore 6
4 Comments:
Mark,
I love when somebody documents what we dont :)
Good job!
Mark,
An FAQ about this topic has been published today: http://sdn5.sitecore.net/faq/administration/how%20to%20auto-include%20configuration%20files.aspx.
Basically, you've covered the major part in your post, but also pay attention how an attribute can be added / updated.
And you can use /sitecore/admin/showconfig.aspx to see the results of your patches (or also a shared source module http://trac.sitecore.net/DetailedConfigReport)
Remember you can also patch the commands section, so no need to modify commands.config.
This post has been removed by the author.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home